How computers beat humans at chess

My son turned four yesterday.

A couple of weeks ago, he was with his older cousin, who became really good at chess, and wanted to play against everyone. So my son watched this new game being played in front of him, and he started to be intrigued. More than anything, the threat of saying « Check » seemed to be an exciting perspective.

He has been talking about chess since then, so yesterday, his birthday gift was a small chess board. On the box, it said: « Object of the game: Capture enough of your opponent’s chessmen to take your opponent’s king into a checkmate position. »


AlphaZero is the most advanced computer program to play chess. Instead of being taught chess through exposure of the thousands of games played by the best human chess masters, AlphaZero discovered chess from scratch, playing games against itself.

Today, AlphaZero can beat any human being at chess. To understand where his strategic strength comes from, an analysis of AlphaZero’s gameplay has been made. One major insight came up: it seems like, after doing all its analyses, AlphaZero is not obsessed about capturing opponent’s chessmen as much as the best human chess masters. The common wisdom about chess was that, the more chessmen you capture from your opponent, the easier it will be for you to corner his king into defeat. But, because AlphaZero didn’t learn chess from humans, it didn’t pick up this piece of wisdom. It just focused on the most effective way to win a game, as proven by millions of simulations. And, it turned out, capturing your opponent’s chessmen does not rank as high as human thought.


The fact that my son’s chess box used that incorrect piece of wisdom as a way to describe the purpose of chess is fascinating. It’s the perfect metaphor for so many situations: Offering advice to someone, framing a problem to be solved without hinting at a particular solution, wondering about the long-term damages of short-term thinking, giving a fish vs teaching out to fish vs showing the river, etc.

The future of education

Ces visages me guident

La sangle, du côté des oreilles

Un bel enseignement

The other role of a parent

Two stories

Weakness or improvement area?

The biggest mistake

Exposure and need

Walking the talk

Simplicity, radicality, playfulness

Teaching neuroplasticity

Les Huit Montagnes

A contrarian view

Simplification of simplification

Benefits of shadowing external peers

Anything simple is false

The curse of simplicity

Public speaking feedback

The basics of OKR

Unpacking my preparation for a speech

Learning a new board game

Un carnet de caractère

L’école tue-t-elle la créativité ?

On en reparle dans 9 ans

Learning happens in stages

Taper juste

Donner une évaluation à quelqu’un

Etude de cas : mes résolutions 2014

Comment tenir une résolution

Pourquoi écrire

Arthur vs Lancelot

Apprendre à jouer aux échecs

Best gift I’ve received this year

Les moments de vide

3 ways to improve your focus


You become an expert

Psychological mecanisms

The entry point

The more experienced you are

Une idée n’est qu’un véhicule


Lui n’a jamais su

5 trucs contre l’insomnies

Deux secrets

Le calendrier de l’habitude

Un jongleur ne regarde pas ses mains

S’extraire de son environnement

La rigidité du rituel

Les pulsions se nourrissent du vide

L’allié de mon cerveau

Le meilleur levier de changement

La bonne distance

Dessine-moi un poisson

La volonté est un muscle

La méthode des petits pas

10 choses apprises en 10 ans d’obsession

Très peu de méthodes

Apprendre à lire plus vite

Trouver plus d’aiguilles